Communitarianism is Tyrannical Communism – Scientific Dictatorship from Globalism to Local Communities – It is how Globalism dictates Localism.
“We’re in a situation today where the people do not even know what it is they are fighting against.”
“In a communitarian system, nobody has rights.” 7:00 in
“Communitarianism is a tyranny of language.”
Community is not its own thing; it does not (and can not) exist outside the collection of individuals, because individuals make community. Community is that side-effect of a gathering of persons all pursuing their individual gains and shared (or at least compatible) interests.
Community as Dependent on, Derived from Individuals
A “community” is not an independent organism. It has no agency, no existence in itself apart from the people who comprise it. When we speak of “the community,” we are really using shorthand for the interactions, relationships, and shared practices of individuals. Without individuals, there is no community; it is always derivative.
Emergent Phenomenon
Because community is not an entity with its own will or consciousness, it is best understood as an emergent phenomenon. That is, when individuals gather, pursue interests, and form bonds, something larger than any one person arises — but this “something” has no independent substance. It is a pattern, a structure of interaction, a “side-effect” of individual pursuits. Much like markets, language, or culture, community emerges out of the interplay of personal actions, not from a central plan or an abstract “communal spirit.”
Individual Gain and Shared Interests
Each person seeks to meet needs, advance goals, or satisfy desires. Where overlap occurs, they cooperate. This overlap — shared interest — is the basis of community. Farmers may trade tools or labor because it benefits each of them. Neighbors may form associations because it improves their safety or quality of life. Even altruistic acts often have personal grounding: reputation, belonging, or internal fulfillment. Thus, “community” is essentially the byproduct of intersecting personal advantages.
The Illusion of Community as a Separate Being
Problems arise when “community” is treated as a separate being with rights, obligations, or authority above its members. Politicians, ideologues, or technocrats may speak of “the community” as if it can sacrifice individuals for its own good. But in reality, there is no “good of the community” apart from the good of the individuals within it. To claim otherwise risks obscuring who is actually benefitting, and who is being coerced.
Community as Fragile and Conditional
Because community exists only as long as individuals perceive value in participating, it is fragile. If shared interests break down, or if the cost of belonging outweighs the benefit, individuals withdraw — and the “community” dissolves. Its persistence depends not on an abstract essence but on ongoing cooperation.
Communitarianism Defined
Communitarianism is a political and social philosophy that emphasizes the interests of the community over those of the individual. It promotes collective responsibility, shared values, and local cohesion, often framing individual rights as subordinate to the “common good.” In theory, this can sound benign or even beneficial. In practice, critics argue it can mask mechanisms of control, where appeals to community well-being are used to justify top-down governance.
Rose Koire’s Perspective
Rose Koire, through her work Behind the Green Mask: UN Agenda 21, exposed communitarianism as the ideological framework behind Agenda 21 and “sustainable development” programs. She argued that communitarianism was being used as a philosophical Trojan horse: it framed itself as balance between rights and responsibilities, but in reality it eroded property rights, individual freedoms, and local autonomy. Koire linked it to a systematic restructuring of governance—shifting power from elected, accountable officials to unelected regional boards, planning councils, and “stakeholder” groups operating under UN or NGO influence.
Communitarianism vs. Communism
While communism abolishes private property outright and establishes centralized state control, communitarianism works more subtly:
- Communism: overtly collectivist, explicit state ownership.
- Communitarianism: covertly collectivist, uses regulations, zoning, and “public-private partnerships” to control how private property can be used, effectively limiting ownership without direct expropriation.
Thus, communitarianism is often described as “soft communism” or “global socialism by stealth.”
Tyranny and Globalism
Critics argue communitarianism is a tool of globalism:
- Tyranny: It normalizes surveillance, regulation, and conformity under the guise of “community consensus.”
- Globalism: It embeds local governments into international frameworks (Agenda 21, Agenda 2030, Sustainable Development Goals), bypassing sovereignty.
- The “local” is restructured to serve global directives, creating a veneer of grassroots democracy while decision-making shifts upward to global technocrats.
The Hegelian Dialectic
The dialectical method—thesis, antithesis, synthesis—is seen as central to how communitarianism advances:
- Thesis: Promote individual rights and freedoms.
- Antithesis: Manufacture crises (climate change, inequality, pandemics) showing “too much freedom” creates chaos or harm.
- Synthesis: Present communitarianism as the “balanced” solution—rights exist only insofar as they serve the community.
This dynamic ensures continual erosion of liberty while appearing rational and consensual.
Takeover of Local Government
Koire documented how communitarianism infiltrates at the local level:
- Regional planning councils replace city councils.
- Public-private partnerships give corporations and NGOs disproportionate power.
- Stakeholder meetings replace direct voting, where selected interest groups claim to speak for “the community.”
- Zoning and smart growth regulations restrict land use, driving people into dense “sustainable” developments.
The effect: local elected officials become rubber stamps for pre-engineered global policies, and citizens are displaced from meaningful decision-making.
Key Takeaways
- Communitarianism presents itself as a middle way but erodes liberty in practice.
- Rose Koire warned it was the philosophical core of Agenda 21 and global governance.
- It shares with communism the subordination of the individual but uses softer, regulatory means.
- It advances through the Hegelian dialectic, manufactured crises, and engineered “consensus.”
- The takeover of local government is its mechanism, aligning local laws with global directives.